• 4 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 4th, 2025

help-circle











  • Show me a game store that supports Linux with a good selection of games of modern and major game titles.

    I suggest you to not play proprietary junk that belongs to evil corporations.

    https://libregaming.org/

    https://libregamewiki.org/Main_Page

    If you feel the urge to play to certain videogames and can’t resist you are probably addicted to these.

    Also, Steam directly supports and funds a plethora of open source tools that benefit everyone.

    So do other evil corporations like microsoft and google. They do more damage than good.

    You’re right about 99.99+% of cases. And I’m not defending Valve as some altruistic company. But lumping in Valve with the likes of Amazon, Oracle, Nvidia, Monsanto, Elon Musk, etc, simply on the amount of money they make is desingenous at best, but frankly is insane.

    Valve ceo owns more megayachts than bezos or elon musk and his company promotes gambling to kids and sell you games under DRMs.

    They are just as bad

    You’re one of those people that have a militant mindset when it comes to FOSS that gives open source a weird and bad reputation.

    You are defending a billionare corporation, do you have any reputation at all?



  • And the reason for their interest has nothing to do with Microsoft’s game studio acquisitions, and everything to do with Microsoft’s attempts to lock down the Windows ecosystem back in the Windows 8/RT days.

    Both of them.

    If you don’t want to use their platform, you don’t have to.

    Exactly, don’t use it

    Usually. But the fact that Valve’s interests align with the benefits of its userbase isn’t a bad thing.

    My interests are in free, open source and decentralized platforms. What about yours?

    Making money isn’t a crime

    Making billions is a crime because there is no good way to do it, you have to be greedy and use shady methods to gain so much money. Valve promotes gambling to kids and makes a billion a year on microtransactions.

    You seem to have a strange hatred towards Valve for simply existing.

    Billionares and corporations do not simply exist, they are built on the exploitation of others


  • That doesn’t make sense to me.

    Here an example that you can understand: nobody should buy gasoline or use cars but many are forced to do it because they have to go to work to earn the money they need to survive. The capitalists pushing this corrupted system are forced to do it only by their own greed, they are the ones who need to be blamed before anyone else.

    Additionally though, of the major gaming retailers, Valve has the least predatory model

    They promote gambling to kids, the “least predatory model” it’s still a predatory model.

    Did you take into account the reasons that game devs choose Valve over other retailers like GOG? Or the fact that very often game devs will use Valve, GOG and other gaming retailers?

    Valve managed to build a small monopoly on the videogame market and together with other tech corporation they managed to centralize internet around a bunch of service/platforms that people are now hooked to. Promoting anything outside the corporation world would result in small to zero visibility.

    You didn’t give any specifics in your answer to me and honestly I have to wonder if you even know where the majority of Valves money comes from.

    From taking a cut on selling games and from microtransactions.

    Now i have a question for you, how does the ceo of valve spend the majority of his money?

    How does the consumer benefit from and why should they switch to a different retailer than Valve’s Steam? What is the benefit of a fediverse style retailer and how does it work?

    https://join-lemmy.org/docs/index.html

    The whole humanity will benefit if we stop giving money to billionares and their private corporations who promote closed and centralized, for profit, evil, business models.






  • Name one other company that’s doing more for open source and open platforms than Valve.

    Any non profit company who’s products isn’t a proprietary third party software launcher.

    They’ve helped push gaming on Linux from a very niche process to basically having Windows native games work better on Linux than on Windows.

    They have built a semi-monopoly on videogames relying for two decades on closed source products and windows, they are now looking at the linux share because microsoft in the past years made bullish acquisitions in the videogames industry.

    The Steam client is a 1st class citizen on Linux. It doesn’t matter that their client is closed source, because all the tools they employ is open source.

    If the client doesn’t matter that much that’s even more reasons to release the source code.

    Name a company that does even half of that. Just one company.

    companies usually make money, non profit organizations help people


  • Name 5 things Valve could implement to change this that would not be to the detriment of indie devs.

    Valve is a for profit company and their main goal is to boost their profits to the roof (valve ceo owns an entire fleet of megayachts). They work to boost their sales not to help other people, when their salesmen lay down 5 things they could implement on the platform their main objective is to do business. Anything you implement that benefit users and devs rather than the already full valve wallet would be a positive change.

    The first thing you want to implement is a less greedy and profits drive mentality, the second thing they could implement is the source code of their platform. They could implement exact sales data for each game and transparency reports on their profits, they could implement a mastodon social page and they could implement disclaimers on AAA titles warning people they are buying games from evil corporations.