• BunScientist@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    From what I know, it has to do with the word red covering the purple part of the spectrum long ago, and the “need” for the word purple came out later but purple things that were named red didn’t get renamed.

    You can look at japanese right now and 青い covers both blue and green, with a relatively recent addition of 緑 to cover only green (thus possibly pushing 青い in the future to be only blue, who knows)

  • Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because they are only purple on the inside. Do you think apples are white? Or bananas?

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, this is kinda weird, but general colors didn’t have names for a long time. Like in Greek texts by Homer he describes the water color as dark wine color because the name “blue” wasn’t a word. So it’s possible when they named a “red onion” purple wasn’t a color and considered a shade of red.

    Also as others have said purple was the color of royalty and they didn’t want an association.

    • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s kind of wild when you learn that words for blue are relatively new in human language.