If that vermin Metsola is still in charge while this gets voted, not even the Parliament will be able to stop it, as she clearly shows she’s more than willing to bypass the Parliament’s decision with chat control 1.0

Paywall doesn’t let me read

Everything goes except taking responsibility as a parent

Was wondering the same thing, I see it as a symbol of constantly enduring a reality of torment and thriving on pure hate. Reminds me of Sisyphus, except that he’s also angry at the gods.

Maybe OP didn’t get the point either on why people might identify with some of these characters.

People have also been using calculators and importing libraries for nearly a century, that doesn’t mean they can’t do computation by paper or write their own libraries. That’s purist thinking and it is stupid.

The road to hell is paved with pre-crime policies

Just take a huge shit on the floor and they’ll make some space

If you have ever talked to an abuse victim, you would know that there is no amount of power you can amass that would protect you from an abusive partner. Sometimes, not even evidence as OP still insists to reject the real world.

Being able to solve checkers doesn’t mean people will stop enjoying playing checkers. It is true that chess could be solved, although you don’t really need to brute force every single possibility ‘by hand’ as that guy implied, but it won’t mean people will stop playing it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability

It’s a fictional character, he can be as old as you want

I stopped reading at “degeneracy”. Slimy author sneaking puritanism under the rug.

Should’ve been in monospace

Doesn’t load for me. I work with ANNs solving problems and compare it with animals doing a similar thing for my PhD. You can see a lot of similarities, and can model some animal behavior after it. However, even with the presence of similarities you can’t completely say it thinks “the same”, but you can say it is functionally equivalent: If you have two functions that give the same output for the same inputs, then they are the same function for that domain, same goes for brains.

Just to be clear, LLMs have some similar thinking patterns with what we know about the neural activity of animal brains, but I wouldn’t say it is the same, and saying they think “like humans” is very subjective.

One thing that is easier to notice is that they struggle with problems that require some form of recursive thinking, which is something a human can do. They can’t simply go back to correct their beliefs, once they spit something out it stays there, so they have to commit to it.

The service is as good as the community who updates it. The more people using, the better it becomes. Be the change you want to see.