🇨🇦 tunetardis

  • 1 Post
  • 26 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2025

help-circle



  • Wow, there is a lot to think about in this comment thread! It’s going to take a lot more showers.

    I’m not an information theorist, but I do wonder sometimes if nature prefers a more chaotic data organization? Even when you look at lower levels than the Internet. Hash tables seem to be winning over tree structures. Randomized network protocols are winning over orderly ones. And even if you look at AI, this used to be a broader term covering other topics such as expert systems which tried to condense human knowledge and a very low entropy way.

    If there’s an inherent bias towards disorganization, where does it stem from? I guess there can be a somewhat better average performance, even if the worst case can be really, really bad. There may also be better resilience? Organized systems tend to fall apart very quickly when something goes wrong.


  • And the internet itself is a layer of order over its decentralised physical infrastructure.

    That’s fair. But you can have different layers of order that manifest in various human pursuits, and the Fediverse seems a fertile ground for exploring such ideas.

    In the early days, the Internet was just a bunch of institutional networks all linked together, with little islands of data that may have had some internal organization. But no big picture view existed, and it never really emerged.

    It seems to me that what’s happened in recent years is individual companies that offer some sort of information service have been centralizing and gatekeeping their product more and more, which does bring some order but at the expense of what makes a decentralized network powerful in the first place.




  • Yes, the internet is decentralised in every way, not only its infrastructure. Even unorganised.

    What’s intriguing to me about the fediverse is it’s trying to layer some order over a decentralized physical infrastructure. I think that’s so cool and really want this sort of idea to work!

    Not all of humanity uses the DD system.

    Yeah that’s fair. I think even my university was using a different system, and of course there’s a lot more out there than book knowledge.

    Indexing the internet is a big job. We had data centers even before A-not-I. And people were complaining about how much energy they use. Had we known then how much worse this is going to get very soon….

    Artificial Unintelligence does not do that job better btw. It doesn’t do the indexing at all. It just wastes energy. And, as another commenter pointed out, it actively makes the situation you describe worse.

    I may not be quite as cynical about AI in its present state, as I feel it has helped me find solutions that had been evading me. I do think it is massively overhyped, however, and am concerned about the directions it’s heading. Concerned a lot, actually.



  • Ah, so you’re saying it’s more of an enshitification thing that killed the search engines? I can believe that to an extent.

    But as the amount of content on the Internet has increased, it’s also become more difficult to narrow the queries to get what you’re really looking for. The main thing for me with AI is it allows you to refine the search without discarding the context of what you have already tried.

    If the content were more organized to begin with, though, I suspect you could drill a bit deeper into the knowledge tree and then apply your conventional (non-AI) search over a more relevant branch?


  • Not anyone can come to the library, put books around, and game/pay the book finding process to make sure their books come first.

    Well, as I recall, things weren’t quite idyllic in the conventional library scene either. People were always moving books around, making librarians furious. Every field trip to the library always began with that lecture. “For the love of all that is holy, do not put books back on the shelf. Let us librarians take care of that.” And once I got to universities with their reference collections, I found that people were purposefully hiding texts in other sections so that they would have exclusive access when they returned. Fun stuff.



  • I can so relate. The mistakes. The regrets. The guilt. The anxiety. The sleep disorders. I’ve got it all in spades.

    I don’t know what to tell you? I’m working on it myself. Sometimes I think of people who stepped in and helped me through difficult times in my life, and then I try to pay it forward even in small ways to other people I meet who are themselves in a bad place. I find this therapeutic.

    I suppose on the bright side, my past has made me a humble person who is not quick to judge others. But there’s a fragility there too, and I fear for how I would cope with whatever new challenges await. These are rather uncertain times.

    Maybe you can take some comfort in knowing you’re not the only one in this funk? I think you’ve actually made me feel better about it a little bit. Anyway, best of luck to you that you find your way.






  • Yeah, if there was any doubt that an outer moon could contain liquid water, Enceladus’ active geysers firmly ended that speculation.

    Europa’s ocean may be on the order of 100 km in depth. By comparison, Earth’s average about 4 km. That would make Europa have far more water than Earth despite being smaller than our Moon.

    It seems as more data come in, it’s getting more and more likely that subsurface liquid water is common in the outer solar system, and that many other moons have varying amounts of it. Even Titan may have water someplace below its surface lakes of liquid methane. The inner solar system is more of a desert, and we are lucky to have what we have.

    If you want more mind-blowing stuff, check out discoveries being made about exoplanets (planets around other stars). These were only detected in the 90s, but there are thousands we know about now, and there are some absolutely crazy examples among them.




  • Well let’s see. I was a nerdy kid in the 70s, so I should be qualified for this. I have to say though, my wildest dreams set a pretty high bar. I dreamed of cities in space and in the oceans. And on land, we’d build giant fusion-powered arcologies modelled after the space cities that recycled everything we used. We’d spent most of our time in these cities connected by tunnelled maglevs while the rest of the world returned to a more natural state and became a giant wildlife/archaeological park.

    But I’m trying to think of what would have blown my mind to learn about back then that actually happened. I think from a technological perspective, I never saw the marriage between computers and telecommunications becoming all that it is today. I had a vague idea of something like a video cell phone, but the idea that you could grab a movie off it from some distant giant computer complex and throw it up on a big screen in your home would’ve made me giddy. And just the quality of the image and the fidelity and depth of sound that could come out of tiny speakers would’ve been shocking. Sound systems were really, really shitty in the 70s. And TVs. Well, let’s just say there was a reason you went to the cinema.

    The science nerd in me would also have been blown away by discoveries made since the 70s. Birds are dinosaurs? There were real life hobbits running around on some island in Indonesia? There are ocean moons in our solar system? And if I showed up to explain all this to my kid self, he would not have believed my age when I told him. Medicine is keeping us younger now.