So what you meant to say was “if you claim that you legitimately researched but you mention Claude - I will assume you did not”.
Which is valid. But is not what you said.
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
Cake day: February 26th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Judging or dismissing a PERSON for using tools you don’t respect = valid.
Saying you “invalidate” content that is “properly researched and legitimately correct” = what?
I mean most people have no idea how to “properly research” - this has been true for centuries - sloppy research is not a new phenomenon. If something was “properly researched” why would you reject it?
I mean Disney’s lawyer game is top notch. I would love to see the mouse vs AI battle.