Nah, you’re the one who has special eyes or have never driven against Teslas and such. The color temperature on modern cars LEDs already makes it feel much brighter on other’s eyes, and then the actual lumens are usually more than triple the lumens compared to halogens.
FedEx in Sweden doesn’t even leave their warehouse to succeed in making their failed delivery. Same with UPS. It’s honestly impressive how successful these two companies can suck at doing the only thing they’re enlisted to do.
I can see in tracking that my packages first get scanned upon arrival to their regional warehouse, and then within 15-30 minutes it becomes “failed delivery, no one home”. Even if I was to be their first stop, driving from the warehouse to my house would take at least 2 hours. Maybe they’re actually trucking it at 300km/hr, but then I’d notice the police chase. But no truck ever seen. Many days I worked from home because I was to get an urgent package that never came.
After the first few times, I joined their “My Choice” and “Delivery Manager” or whatever they call it… but that did absolutely nothing, even if I explicitly choose “leave the package at my doorstop, I don’t care if someone steals it”, the shit still never leaves their warehouse!
I have never seen the face of a single FedEx or UPS man in real life, despite having 30+ packages from them over the years. Maybe they don’t dare to show themselves after screwing me over for so many years…? But then they could at the least just throw my packages outside my door and run for their life instead of hoping I’m going to drive to your warehouse and pick it up myself!
If I want to buy something and don’t see a PostNord or DHL option, I’m not buying. And if it ends up being FedEx/UPS somehow, I contact the seller to choose something else, or to just give me a refund directly, because it’s not gonna arrive.
And what might come as a surprise for some Germans, DHL here works wonderfully basically 100% of the time. Thank you Germans for doing your jobs ❤️
you need to codify that the AI agent can’t be responsible and determined who is (the company or the model creator)
Sure. But that’s not exactly what the proposed law is though?
These companies all want to be captured, “we’re so dangerous, America is going to get destroyed if we’re not mainlined into that $1 trillion/year ‘defense’ budget!”
He got caught pissing with his pants all the way down, because it “feels good man”.
Has it gotten that bad in America that you’d be able to put an extra $100 on groceries without most people noticing? $10 though, sure.
Yeah, I get that. But there hasn’t been any draft yet, so everyone on that boat has voluntarily joined the military.
Has there been a draft yet, or what do you mean?
Female USB-A cables were still common enough that we’ve learned to accept it.
It could be a lot worse. Imagine seeing your robot looking at male-to-male power cables. Call me old-fashioned, but that’s where I draw the line, no robot of mine would have such extreme tastes.
I love Oxford commas, but I don’t see how that’d help with the students’ first, hand-job experience.
Only once? I guess that’s further confirmation that childhood trauma runs deep.
it’s only legal if you agreed to the fee when you first took out the debt
Which is most likely defined in their terms.
There must be a way to pay without fee.
According to whom? As far as I’m aware, there’s no such law in the US regarding private companies. So they can be jerks if they want to.
You’d think so, but then she doesn’t actually want it, and you either need to gorge it down or waste it.
Am I uneducated about how SNAP works, or is this a rare Texas W?
I think it’s outrageous that you can’t even buy hygiene articles or medicines with SNAP, and in that way it’d make sense that something so non-nutritious like candy shouldn’t be allowed? Alcohol isn’t allowed either for example, despite the fact that beer would be (at least marginally) more nutritious than candy.
So other than increasing the stigma already associated with SNAP, is it really problematic to ban candy? Even if it’s not a major cost point, the principle of “poor people are too dumb to budget themselves, so we won’t let them buy necessities like diapers and tampons… but we’ll gladly let them buy candy” just feels wrong to me?
Me neither. But it’s an easy solution, just fill the tube with some toilet paper for extra padding.
Don’t you mean “could be the reasoning”? AI companies aren’t profitable, they would want to be “publicly owned” so that everyone else will be holding their bags. They’re already trying to hedge it into everyone’s retirement funds etc. It would not be in our best interests to be even more exposed to this.