jumping redditor [they/them]

drawn pornographic depcitions are generally legal and protected by the first amendment in the united states, even if the artist explicitly states the characters are minors.

children watched beheading videos all the time and tutned out fine, why would this slop be any different?

Thankfully it is somewhat agreed that that toy company made a horrible decision that ruined toy design by requiring excessive safety.

isn’t it in open alpha?

bots and unlabled echo chambers are the worst parts of social media, along with Zelous Moderators that enforce non-existent rules.

just remember that raid is not a backup

sounds beautiful, what’s the catch?

even the russian part of Europe?

the constitution restricts the governments ability to conduct unreasonable searches, not people like google or facebook.

Cars go through places where people don’t live, and that is one of the best usages for cars.

where are there gas stations, let alone EV chargers every 100km?

that’s the entire point of fines, to internalize external costs.

If it’s still profitable after full enforcement of fines then either the fines were not correctly set or the buisness model is a net positive.

shocking no one, laws are worded in complicated ways that lawyers will take full advantage of.

was more thinking of quest 2 when quest 3s came out and psvr2 pricing ($300), which isn’t that much above the cheapest non roku garbage

insider information makes them useful predictions.

not too different than how oil futures are set, and those are a reasonable indicator for gas prices.

If I were in their shoes I wouldn’t either, reducing the cut now increases the chance you would need to increase it later which for a platform largely thriving off goodwill would not be the smartest decision.

isn’t producing better art the point of starving artists? or am I misunderstanding the phrase?