I mean, it’s likely that a good chunk of these hyperscale data centers and some of these big corporate LLMs will run out of cash and close shop. We’ll probably see a big pivot to much more efficient models that are local and/or purpose-built, not unlike what the Chinese are already doing.
An economic bubble doesn’t require that the assets suddenly disappear upon the bubble popping.
The 2008 financial crisis was caused in part by the popping of a real estate bubble in the US. Those properties didn’t magically evaporate after the bubble popped, though many families couldn’t afford to keep their homes.
In the same manner, nobody is really suggesting that LLMs will suddenly disappear after the AI bubble pops, only that they will probably be proven to be significantly less profitable and get scaled back.
Still not eating the overrated bigot chicken.
Or you could do what my outlook does and just never empty the trash despite setting a 30 day policy. Recently discovered i have 3 years of “deleted” emails
I wish there was a way to decline only future occurrences, though. I don’t want to remove the previous meetings.
Probably because those are 2 different things?
Dawg it’s literally the whole basis for the article
“[The police] use Prevent coercively because it basically means that you have a reason to try and intervene in that person’s life and to put pressure on them to try and engage with you.”
“If they put pressure on a family, it’s through their children. That’s the Achilles’ heel of every parent is their baby. Fear of losing their child and the fear of Prevent turning up.”
They’re abusing the law to intimidate Muslim families. There’s no concern at all about or on behalf of the child, any more than the people reporting random Latinos to ICE have.
What a ridiculous fucking clickbait headline
Right? Like I’ve got plenty frustrated at times, but I never wished harm upon the kids. I just wanted a damn break so they would be someone else’s problem for a few minutes lol.
Interesting. I know in the abstract they specifically say this cannot be generalized outside of mathematics, but I’d be curious to see if there’s a similar phenomenon in other subjects.
Some of my classmates, in various subjects from grade school all the way through my master’s degree, would struggle in certain topics and claim that they simply couldn’t do it rather than keep trying until they succeeded. I wonder how many of those scenarios were self-fulfilling prophecies based in their lack of confidence in their ability to learn novel information.
Misread the whole damn abstract. They said that findings from other fields couldn’t necessarily be extended to math/science due to the task-specificity, not that the findings couldn’t be extended to other fields.
thinking yourself above getting annoyed by it is setting yourself up for failure.
I didn’t say I’ve never been annoyed by the children I worked with (which was also not in the scenarios you so condescendingly suggested). I never considered setting up a child fight club, which is beyond fucked up and what it seemed you were suggesting. None of the people I worked with ever suggested such a thing, either.
when you work with children there’s always a moment that makes you consider it
What the fuck? I used to work with kids and this never once even crossed my mind.
Some people mistake knowledge for intelligence
Sure, but there’s a difference between existing in society and actively going out of your way to fund projects that are made by hyper-racists (like the omarchy guy)
That’s not at all what the article you linked claims. The ‘mixed feelings’ had to do with using the terms being used performatively instead of actually putting in the work to create inclusive spaces.
When an expert or organisation got it [the use of neurodiverse and neurodivergent] wrong, especially one claiming to be inclusive, it could be seen as a “red flag”. Some participants thought this was a sign that they used fashionable inclusive language while failing to change exclusionary practices.
Use the slur and own being a shithead or shut up. “Regarded” is as pathetic as maga trying to dogwhistle “fuck joe biden” with “let’s go brandon”
I honestly don’t give a fuck if it was a reference to something, depicting violence against women to protect your fucking golf clubs from cooties or whatever is wildly unacceptable. The fact that even the script got approved is mind boggling, let alone that the shoot, editing, and distribution all pushed it through.
Callaway and Good Good Golf are now on my ‘never buy, even used or on sale’ list.
I’ve been to known to do this. When I was on a stimulant for ADHD, I would get ravenously hungry whenever it wore off, which was often late in the evening.
That doesn’t really explain why it’s such a trope, but my theory is that you’re right about it being a US thing. It is common for us to eat dinner/supper early (like 5-7 pm) relative to some parts of Europe, which means that there’s more time until breakfast and therefore we’re more likely to get hungry late in the evening.
No, they aren’t saying that “humans are meant to be shuffling around a warehouse picking and packing orders mindlessly.”
The point is that the processes are designed around human operators with specific considerations for the abilities and constraints of an average human. Dropping a robot into a process without updating said process around the abilities and constraints of the_robot_ creates new problems. Humans and robots work in different ways and cannot be substituted 1:1 without creating problems.