• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 10th, 2026

help-circle





  • echo@lemmy.todaytoTechnology@lemmy.world•Used processor leads to game ban
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    In this case they even had a completely different install of Windows. There is simply no way at all that the fingerprint should match. If it did match, then their implementation sucks. Fuck them if they made it that bad intentionally. Better to have to catch and ban the same person 10 times than ban an innocent person even once.


  • Their fingerprinting is flawed if this story is true. If I take someone else’s CPU and drop it into what is otherwise different hardware then the fingerprint should absolutely change. If it doesn’t then their fingerprinting is broken and this is going to happen whether any particular CPU has been banned or not.

    It seems far more plausible that someone got themselves banned and they’re lying to try to get out of it.









  • echo@lemmy.todaytoPrivacy@lemmy.ml•Blur your house
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wouldn’t call you ignorant for not knowing information from some arcane document over x years old from a European country.

    Why not? I almost certainly would be ignorant about it. Ignorant just means I don’t know something… there’s all kinds of things that I don’t know.






  • echo@lemmy.todaytoPrivacy@lemmy.ml•Blur your house
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You switched gears in the middle of your statement. Either photography from the public spaces is legal or it isn’t. The only reason I don’t consider these take-downs a first-amendment violation is because Google is providing the mechanism to do it. They legally have every right to take the picture of your house and tell you to go pound sand if you don’t like it.