

I’m not sure what you read in what I wrote sorry. My comment wasn’t sarcasm it was defeat.


I’m not sure what you read in what I wrote sorry. My comment wasn’t sarcasm it was defeat.


Short, instant and hidden seems to be winning over anything else.


Saw a video once of one of the slop generators (not the type of person you would expect too!) Being very angry about the 2010s “summaries” that google would give you. Wish I could find the video again.


Merging probably has more value as people would understand the edge cases, with generated regexp it would be harder for someone to confidently understand the edges without having a deeper understanding of the algorithm and data set.


I’m not too concerned, for example, if they have to check their spam folders
Then you can self host. I use stalwart but in your case I would probably use mox


Does it do exclusions? Can it merge regexp?


Pretty sure the whole point of this is to “we need to start giving ai credit” from the other side.


It sounds like there is too much diffuse of responsibility


You will have to get it in a digest and ration it throughout the day


You know we can roll back the internet a bit… Let’s keep the speed and the unlimited traffic but drop the “always on” and give people “mobile internet hours” for their phone? :P


So they pay someone to lock / unlock it, that’s an externalized cost of not solving the issues elsewhere. A little too much on the individualistic side of things.


https://goreleaser.com/ does Rust now… But it’s binary focused but probably what the guy is doing…
For go Debian has: https://go-team.pages.debian.net/ I would imagine there is something similar for rust?
Being open source helps a lot, however he should probably source help for each distro. He is right that it’s a pain but I’m not sure his reasons are.


Pushing as much of the costs of generated AI onto the contributor is 100% the right way to do this. There has been a substantial shift towards generated code. Which might be temporary depending on your belief system but we are in the world we are in right now.
Contributors using LLMs should have a burden of proof higher than that of traditional contributors. This includes tests, recordings, proofs, discussion, etc.
It’s a business