For Amusement Purposes Only

The question is mine or yours?

The High Corvid of Progressivity

Chance favors the prepared mind.

~ Louis Pasteur

  • 6 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle











  • According to who? The CIA and FBI agents that beat a confession out of him? The press that presumed him guilty the moment they chose to notice him? We have no idea who this guy actually is other than what they claim, because it’s never come out in a public court of law.

    If there’s evidence to convict him, convict him and make him suffer the penalty of the law. Otherwise you’re destroying a man on the basis of hearsay, and undermining your own justice system in the process.





  • Schrama cited an “unbroken continuation of the CIA’s psychological conditioning and severe coercion”

    Torture. The word you’re looking for is torture. The CIA & FBI tortured this man for over twenty years.

    Oh, and they did it illegally, because:

    FBI agents intentionally failed to tell Mohammed that he had a right to be silent and to consult a lawyer.

    So they tortured this man for over twenty years while denying him the right to counsel or even to be silent, then expected the judge to accept his confession as legitimate.

    Whether or not you have sympathy for Mohammed, how he’s been treated is an absolute shit-show. Remember, this man has yet to be convicted of a crime, and the crime they’re going after him for, heinous though it may be, happened 25 years ago.

    Here’s the rub - if they have the evidence to convict, then they don’t need the confession. Yet they found the need to waterboard this man for 20+ years to obtain it. This means that the other evidence they have against him is too flimsy to secure a conviction on its own.

    And that means they’ve been torturing a technically innocent man for three decades to save face.