Yeah if it’s just a basic input with a function call for spam or not spam the risk is low. What’s the worst case outcome, it tricks it into saying no it isn’t a scam and you have to delete it manually? Hahaha

I feel like these were posted by OP in close enough proxy for this outcome to be engineered but I still got a chuckle.

https://vger.to/lemmy.world/post/52447000

The benefit here is the software by design can’t read your traffic - it’s using SNI to route, not the host header, so SSL pass thru keeps the payload private. It’s billed as shareable for that reason.

Also this is open source and you can host it yourself.

Edit: I concede BakedCatboy’s point.

In either case I would probably just use FRP.

In the US at least, this is why you use a credit card. If your package gets lost in transit and the merchant refuses to remedy the issue, that’s a easy dispute for merchandise not received. It doesn’t matter what the merchant tells you, it’s their responsibility to ensure the merchandise arrives.

That being said, every shipping protection scheme I’ve personally seen is billed as a convenience feature - “less hassle”.

That’s how you end up with another Zuckerberg!