GOALS

there are some very narrow uses where AI is actually useful. Most of what it’s used for is junk though. The early internet was the same way, but at least that was charming about it. I doubt that a website comprised of 1200 clipart hamster gifs and a pitch toned clip of a song from Disney’s Robin Hood is going to hack a competing Sites mainframe looking for ways to inflate its page veiws.

The AI bubble will burst, companies will actually sit down, pull their heads out of their asses, and actually apply it to something useful, as it was originally conceived.

the entropic logo at the bottom is not giving me optimistic emotions

Serves them right: Facebook is not the Yellow Pages. Quit treating it like one. Should have been made a rule back in 04’ when it was just taking off.

or call out the hypocrisy of the moderation team, (despite moderation critiques not technically being against the rules)

Can you imagine if Reddit had to throw all the AI mods in the trash because they were regulated to? The autistic screeching of the M’Lady neckbeards, might actually be music to my ears!

I’m in this post and I don’t like it. Reddit is imploding under its own bulk and tech bro fellating. Ya hate to see it. It was so pleasant once upon a time. But alas, “Die a hero or live long enough,” and all that.

I mean, both can be true.

Then you are afflicted with anthroexceptionalisim. We are animals. We obey the same rules of genetics. You are categorically incorect.

I always check pornhub “for science” ;)

I would have said “scalable metrics” but we were talking about climbing mountains and I didn’t want to garner confusion. (small rimshot)

well that’s true for other animals as well. The “objectionable” part is the controlled breeding. If you were to single out the smart ones that DID excell and made them have kids eventually you would start to see results. But indeed, that is the rub. It’s wrong to force that sort of thing upon people with out their consent. That’s why Eugenics doesn’t work, not because the theory is unsound.

This reminds me of the guy who uploaded his entire collection of DBZ to PornHub because they could give a rats ass about copyright infringment.

no, it’s “set realistic goals with achievable metrics and reasonable KPI’s”

Preach

crosspost to c/FuckReddit

Can you breed a dog? Can you breed a cat? Can you breed a Horse? Can you breed a Bird? Can you breed a Snake? Can you breed a Spider? Can you breed a Fish?

HUMANS ARE NO DIFFERENT

I’m not claiming its Right to do, JUST THAT IT’S POSSIBLE

bud, Eugenics (as a theory) is not incorrect, just how stupid, evil people apply it. It’s the reason African americans dominate American sports: The slavers spent 300 years breeding them for strength and endurance, because that’s also what makes a good slave. It’s morally wrong, yes (100%), but it’s also objectively true.

I’ve always seen the end state as too difficult to stabilize. Mixed systems where Socialist ideals keep capitalist ones in check seem to work best long term because it satisfies natural human ambition without allowing the monied interests to acquire to much social and political power. (the New Deal, Nordic model)

Under most communist systems, especially in democratic societies, ironically, the proletariat still lacks true power as the operators of the means of production (the foreman or the managers) end up also being the leaders of the government. This is no different than oligarchy, just inversed.

In a proper system, there should be a separation of business and state just as there is a separation of church and state; for precisely the same reason.

a Skeletor Reminder:

“Due to the fact that humans are no different from any other animal when it applies to the genetics of breeding, the children of two pornstars should therefore be better pornstars than their parents.”

UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN!