Turns out, in our modern society, the former is a far more valuable skill than the latter.

that was knows and loudly displayel by all the apple fanbois and Jobs

oh, yes… 100%

racists are the saddest people alive, they have to fold back into something nobody controls to feel superior because their actual lives amounts to nothing

but fake fairness because, 54% of wellfare recipients in Arkansas are white

NOBODY CARES SENILE RAPIST OLDBAG

but only the parents, there may be hope for the kids

AI is already expected and required in my job

then you should be looking for a new job… unless you happen to be on a very specific niche, any company so committed to current AI that cannot survive without, will implode in short time

I’m guessing they will eventually return after the idiot Dad runs from the Russian draft or gets killed in the Ukraine front

yeap, that is likely the case… but if we don’t even give kids the benefit of doubt, we will never break the cycle

when they are so brain damaged that war is an adventure like in the TV but knowing that some person in Canada is cay and exists, that’s the real danger!!!

As a petty individual I’m just happy he FAFO but then I remember the kids and hope the idiot turns back to Canada so they are spared their dad supidity…

ah, the beauty of American “democracy*”

~democracy is a trade mark of “Billionaires for America”, any similarity with the meaning of the word is purely coincidental. By reading this disclaimer you agree to hand over all data collected about you, free from limitations or compensation, in perpetuity~

They could owe billions… but courts will settle for a promise to do better

Yes, apparently that documentary was pivotal!

The fact that you reference Linux in a discussion about Outlook makes me think you don’t know what you are talking about.

Have a good life

Yes why not just do more work to compensate for MS mediocrity?! what a great idea!!!

Yes but God forbid you forget when that meeting is or misremember any detail… good luck finding it in the calendar amongst the rest

that’s larger then coca cola, that’s larger then Salesforce and every other software company except Microsoft. That’s 5x growth on $10b , that is unheard of in the software industry, much less any other industry.

and you only need the to double it (the full 100 billions} to make a profit lol…

IDK what to tell you if you don’t believe the numbers, yes they aren’t official but every credible source is pointing to massive revenue growth

define “credible”

Also do you think they would cook the books to that extent if they are still going ahead with an IPO? Fabricating $50b in revenue would hurt an IPO once it’s found out way more then some temporary hype from a NYT article.

the ipo they are already postponing for “safety”?

https://fortune.com/2026/09/12/sam-altman-openai-ipo-delay-ill-advised-moment-safety-concerns/

https://www.investors.com/news/technology/anthropic-ipo-delayed-openai-expects-massive-cash-burn/

People are adopting the current models, mostly coders right now.

Models are being push down people’s throats, mostly to coders right now… there FIFY

Most people using LLMs are using them for basic information search, ie. Google AI overviews. Those tasks don’t require the top models and don’t burn that many tokens so the companies keep them free to get the public exposed to AI.

Again, this is forced, you literally cannot perform a google search (or bing) without getting some AI results whether you want it or not. Then AI companies, like you, use this to pretend it’s actual demand for their products

… All of that equates to large bills for token spend to anthropic or open AI

If 3% of people generate the cost the AI companies cannot keep to the prices they charge, then this is the definition of an unprofitable business

This is why both open AI and anthropic are both seeing extremely high revenue growth. Anthropic ended 2025 with $9b in revenue , they are now on track to hit $100b revenue this year

No, this is what they ARE CLAIMING THEY WILL REACH. Last year, Altman said it was ridiculous that people were saying they generated $12 billion in revenue… just to then show it was less than that. Now they are delaying their IPO which means the books stay closed for another while longer

THAT IS INSANE, no software company has ever seen that kind of growth

Again you are just drinking the koolaid here (not counting all the anecdotal evidence you now apply to all of Silicon Valley). The truth is that whatever revenue they actually have (or claim, “trust me bro”), you can’t even know if half of it comes from new investments, creative accounting or selling off assets, you just assume it is more people demanding more of their services and paying through the nose for it even if they have barely showed any tangible results in real life https://fortune.com/2026/08/22/executives-ai-productivity-layoffs-study/

but if they even double there revenue next year that could change.

Oh that’s it? just double the already inflated revenue they are reporting without any evidence? of course!!! and all I need to fly is to grow some wings, that’s it, it’s really that simple

if that were true, and the current models were actually good, there would be wide adoption of the current models while people wait for the next leap… instead, you get glimpses of the terrible numbers like 3% of user base is actually paying for these things

maybe we torture our analogies to death but you make it sound like they have the formula for coca cola but instead of selling that, they are burning cash trying to find an even better formula

when the reality is that they have something that is technically drinkable and not officially poison and they are selling it like the next elixir of life (while they burn cash trying to catch up to their own hype)

yeah? so a model trained in 2 year old data is just as good? as a model trained today?

If you decide the recipe is good enough and stop doing that research you can still make money making and selling ice cream.

So they are just choosing to lose money? they have a perfectly good, profitable product but they choose to lose money… ok bud

Your point only makes sense if we agree the current models are still not good enough to make a profitable product and thus, they need to keep pushing