And what?

“Hey! You the guy who posted on Lemmy??”

Nowhere is it written that an actual AGI system would be aligned with the hopes and desires of its creator. That’s a baseless assumption that we shouln’t take as gospel.

That has nothing to do with your original claim.

There doesn’t exists an agreed upon definition for what we mean by “intelligence” which makes this a bit strange claim to make. What are you actually even saying?

I don’t see him claiming AI would do that. He very clearly says that he hopes this would be the case.

That pretty much aligns with what I said about this a few days back in a different thread:

Humans are inherently flawed. Even the best ones are biased, emotional, irrational and easily manipulated. My (perhaps) unpopular opinion is that politics will never run like a well-oiled machine that treats everyone fairly for as long as they’re run by people.

A truly benign, aligned and independent AGI system is the only thing I can even imagine that could at least in theory offer the kind of governing system we actually need. And I truly mean an independent agent with our well-being as the guiding principle. Not one with an inbuilt bias toward who made it.

Now, whether that’ll ever be actually possible is a different story but the “best case scenario” for a human-run government and an AI-run government are light-years apart.

How can you tell? It might very well be considering how many fancy words were used there. Nothing about that reads as not-AI.

It is censored. Just in a unconventional manner.

That technique doesn’t work here. This isn’t a video and it haven’t been pixelated either.

How is it easy to bypass?

Sorry, but what’s the witch hunt for again?

Why not? It’s only “bad” compared to newer Abloys.

Or self-employed, homeowner and have a 4 years wage in savings.

ADHD is a speed bump, not a brick wall.

It’s holy because the reasons for it are dictated in their holy book and thus getting killed in said war grants you a place in paradise.

I’m happy to hear that you still think about me.

No, you don’t like me.

And what did I do this time? I asked you to provide evidence for a claim you made. That’s literally all I did. Had such evidence existed you would’ve provided it but you didn’t. I called you out and you got offended by it.

I don’t think I’m the issue here - you just appear to be a hateful person and you don’t even seem to need a reason for it. I mean… look at your modlog - this is what you do.

And what are you hoping to achieve by telling me this? I’m genuinely asking.

I wasn’t questioning whether anyone has ever done this. I was questioning whether they have even a single piece of evidence suggesting that this particular person has done so or if this accusation is purely motivated by simply not liking them which does not justify spreading disinformation.

You got any evidence to back that claim up?

It’s possible to disagree without insults and rudeness. That was completely uncalled for.

I’d look for someone with a nuanced view as the extreme ends of almost any spectrum rarely arrived there through wisdom or rationality.