

Mmmm Adobe subscriptionless Copyright-Law-Slurry slop 🤤🤤🤤
Some wise cis person once thought:
“If I’m wrong about being trans and I take hormones for no reason, at least I’d have a more femme body.”


Mmmm Adobe subscriptionless Copyright-Law-Slurry slop 🤤🤤🤤
Salty? Sounds worth going to the doctor to get that checked
Sorry, can someone explain? Looks interesting but I’m not getting it.


Here where it’s native, a few companies make various products, like flavored cookies, crackers, rusks, teas, “carob honey” (viscous extract, like sweeter, less sour, but slightly tart balsamic), and sometimes just dried carob itself, as a snack.
Most of these are kind of a novelty, mostly appealing to tourists as something new and weird, but some of them can be very tasty, and have extremely rich flavors.


Maybe haunted by lobsters?
I think OP might have meant like, chicken ghosts, or something, but those die in the factories that sell them, which are, for al intents and proposes, already haunted in our own world.

I think they’re talking about the mechanics, viewing “those things” (the planes) as wives, the mechanics’ autistic (<-complimentary) love transcending material and size, to reach around to lust.
Sounds about right, to be honest.
Whoops, simple questions expose the instigator account.
I’m being a bit nasty here, it’s possible you’re just a person being an all-natural incredible asshole, noticed my irony in those questions, and chose to stop engaging.
But if that’s the case, why even do such a good job, of taking your feelings out on people, with such a nonsensical, victim-blaming opinion?
And I’d like to stand on that point and specific word: Victim-blaming.
You did the “If she wasn’t wearing that she wouldn’t be assaulted” thing.
That’s why I’m honestly asking what you thought about in this situation.


It’s a joke by hyperbole. Or someone being silly.



High quality edit
Meme format of
If you like a society of people smart enough to not need rulers you should try anarchy


This is so cute it’s making me cry 😭
I have a couple of questions. First, I don’t fully follow your main argument. What is too much? Where it’s the hypocrisy? Can you explain what is is you’re seeing, that is making you feel enough pain to be posting here in this way?
Second, how were things in your time, as you were growing up? How was the internet like?


It’s many other things, but sure, one of them is this too.
Do you actually want the people with this (anti-data-collection) opinion, to stop posting online? Why?
Do you have an actual point you want to say, or are you content with mocking people and stirring things up?
Hmmmmm… I do wonder how they came to be in possession of that information. Not judging, just wondering
Because this data doesn’t end up owned by a corporation.
It’s now freely available to anyone who has means to read it.
Because people need to communicate in order to build community, and leaving the online space to the corporations is stupid.


How dare you speak this way about SatansMagottyCumFart.
You insult their honor.


The problem is being a landlord as a job. The problem is rich people buying up housing (or land and building on it) they don’t use, in order to rent for profit.
It’s about everyone who has no house. All the people who have no alternative, apart from renting from some rich people.
If someone “allowed” others to live in his house, without demanding half their salary, you wouldn’t see me complaining.
And the reason that buying or building a house is so expensive, is explicitly because rich people clamber over each other, to make the best investment of their lives: Housing.


One heavily oversimplified answer, from the many possible ideas, is:
Nationally built cheap housing, with minimal or no rent. That means, housing as a public good, like nationally owned water and electricity companies.
how do i upvote twice