But the question is whether or not they’re actively holding debt or just letting themselves get diluted through investments.

There’s more supply than demand for compute at the moment, so Microsoft is more than happy to buy ownership through Azure credits - Likewise Amazon is with AWS credits

I recently read a decent article (in Danish mind you), focused on the positions some volunteers had from getting more fans to their local football club… Because they now posted stuff on Facebook.

Then followed up by an expert on engagement, and statistics on about half the population felt AI image generations to be off putting - And a fair chunk of the remainder not really caring, and a small minority finding it cool/useful.

That experts main position, was the human touch was lost and the volunteer of the local football club would most likely get more people to stadium if they asked a bunch of 2nd graders to draw match day posts.

Because it would genuinely connect to people. So yeah, a lot of smaller businesses and volunteers are currently having a feeling all of this AI gen is giving them more traffic and attention, but in reality they’re getting more attention because they went from doing nothing to doing something

The question is whether or not whoever or whatever Gabe puts into his place when he steps down will act like him.

I see it as a serious likelihood he’ll proof the company against venture capital and going public

In the ideal world they’d do it oppositely, low/no cut on the first income and then increase it for the bigger productions.

But capitalism gonna capitalism, and the whales could be legitimate competitions. So they get it cheap, while the fish pay 30% to be on the biggest market

You’re capping mate, it becomes a fluid after 15-30 minutes.

Why should it clog anything?

I think it’s pretty common to take a wank in the shower, but I suppose others use it for music or radios

Because skin tone still relates to status, pale equals you can stay inside rather than in the field.

Meanwhile in Northern Europe tan is status, as it indicates you can be in the sun outside rather than stuck in the office

I’m a lot like you, I make vegetarian food myself. But if I’m visiting someone and they serve meat, I’ll have a slice.

My exception is game, as a large chunk of my family are hunters

To indicate terrorists are subjective

I know some people think like you, but it’s the most soul crushing shit in the world when all you do is wait for others.

Corporate jobs has always been soul crushing, and that’s why the cushy office jobs pays nicely. Because it drains you

Not read, but if you peer review something outside of your field. Experts should be able to see you’re off field and not assign the same level of credibility to that peer review

Couldn’t this easily be solved by one university building a platform?

I understand there’s a need to verify people actually are who they are and have credibility on the topic they review.

So starting out utilising uni logins or something alike, and you’ll have all university professors included

Well, it still doesn’t know it was doing anything wrong.

Most of the LLMs are tuned towards agreeing with the user, if you had a LLM able to stop a train crash. And you then blamed it for stopping the train crash, it would still start with a “sorry”

Then they do it on the OS, forcing people to swap to Linux - But the majority of users wouldn’t know how

Football manager have always had “let’s kick racism out of football” and other NGOs represented on their banners - Because they had no clue what to do with it, I’m pretty sure there’s a settings option to replace them with real paid ads now

For corporate software, there’s so many bugfixes and features, which require so few additions/changes that it’s faster to do it than to write the prompt.

But obviously only if you’re able to hold the entire codebase in your skull, but a proficient developer should be able to do so.

If people begin outsourcing these changes to LLMs, then they’re cooked and no longer able to verify the output.

Agriculture may use AI to inform how they do things, and eventually, machines could then take that knowledge and run the farm for you.

Given how straight tractors drive, the way you can programme the topend to self plant/harvest a field. The driving itself isn’t AI, but there’s a ton of image recognition software popping up that can limit the amount of pesticides used. As they’re able to recognise the exact areas in need of them.

Then we have drones able to capture soil efficiency and there’s probably a ton of other cases. AI is definitely altering farming and in theory could also reduce the needed amount of manpower - As more and more specialised machinery, can be used more or less autonomously. There’s legitimately farms in the Netherlands marked as airports, so they’re allowed to fly drones of a certain size. And all the imagery processing is also depending on a kind of AI

I think a big unknown right now, would be how many Millennium Problems are new GenAI techniques able to bruteforce with existing mathematical techniques/theories?

We just saw one massive bruteforce, can we bruteforce any of the Millennium problems related to cryptography? Because then all hell could break lose rather quickly

AND it’s subsidised by too big a supply of compute power - Microsoft prints demand for Azure, by buying ownership stakes in openAI through the grant of Azure credits. There’s too much available compute.