• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is it? It’s vital to the tech giants marketing and trillion dollar valuation. But I don’t think it’s vital to most of their clients anymore.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you want it’s “knowledge” to be up to date, the training never ends.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        In theory the “reasoning” part doesn’t need a knowledge update.

        Cost/benefit maybe the knowledge update only needs something every 5 years.

        Basically I can see a world where inference is provided and consumed at cost. I can’t see one where customers are willing to cough up billions for a slight increase in the knowledge base.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m comparing the whole of human knowledge to 5 years of additional facts. Most useful things are known. An llm doesn’t need to know the current US president to invent a biscuit recipe.