• blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s the writing that needs work. Your comments heavily suggest that you only have seen the food but never halve eaten it. Is that incorrect?

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        At no point does it imply I’ve never eaten it. You’ve chosen to infer that because you think it’s a gotcha ihat feeds your pointless compulsion to continue arguing in favor of shitty fried chicken.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          someone else brings some in. And, because I have eyes, I can see them falling apart before even being picked up. And I conclude that I’m still not missing out on anything.

          You’re maintaining that this sentence doesn’t carry the implication that you didn’t eat the food?

          • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Does the implication I don’t eat food at that time automatically mean I’ve never eaten the good? Fuck. Education has failed.

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Why would you choose a time you did not eat the food as an example of why the food is not good?

              Choosing that story if it were your only time being in contact with that food would make a ton of sense.

              Also, there’s no need to be insulting. It serves no purpose.