• postman@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve used AI for medical transcription before and it is absolutely incredible. It’s not just a word for word text, but a detailed clinical breakdown of everything discussed.

    All you have to do is simply read the damn thing thoroughly and correct whatever minor errors pop up.

    Takes 95% less time.

    • Akasazh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m unsure if there’s an ethical issue with putting patients medical records in the data machine.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Medical AI has guardrails out the wazoo. By the time it’s made available to a physician, it’s probably been reviewed by a council, vetted by IT, and negotiated heavily by Legal. If the data leaves the premises, it’ll be thoroughly protected and isolated.

        That said, fuck AI. I’d give up medical transcription to get the environment, economy, and sanity back. Musk’s data center is running dozens of natural gas turbines in a low-income, primarily Black neighborhood 11 miles down the road from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. It’s positively ghoulish.

        • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Horseshit. Medical AI is using Oracle services. Larry mother fucking Elison is storing and processing this data.

          The medical industry seems so ignorant about this. They think the argument is just about AI. It’s also about the fact that I don’t trust the people you’re partnered with.

          I get so pissed when the AI consent is baked into other paperwork with no opt out. I will leave.

          Edit: https://www.oracle.com/customers/beacon-health/

          Edit: they might not all be, but I’m not authorizing your arbitrary “AI use” clause. You might as well be, now or at some point down the road.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Exactly. It is a tool for professionals to use to speed up existing processes. It is not a replacement for people, regardless of what the marketers tell you so you buy their product. I don’t understand how there aren’t thousands of lawsuits against these AI companies for their blatantly false advertising.

      AI keeps proving this day by day when people try to make it a replacement and have it blow up in their faces every day.

      • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        blatantly false advertising.

        SEC is neutered, what makes you think anyone in charge of advertising rules hasn’t been replaced by a 17 year old called Goebbels Gobbler or something with a DOGE laptop.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          SEC is neutered

          This article is about an incident in Australia. The SEC has no bearing on what Australia can do.

          • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The AI bubble is an American phenomenon and their SEC isn’t slowing down the insanity. Their lack of a functional SEC is everyones problem.